Current Canonical Package · September 12, 2026
ALPRP separates the case for change, the operating model, and the proposed test. The documents are maintained together, versioned separately, and revised when evidence or implementation requirements change. This synchronized release incorporates the Behavioral Health & Life Recovery Continuum across the policy case, operating framework, Pilot 100, and executive brief.
Start here
A two-page orientation to the problem, the three-document architecture, the five-stage model, the Behavioral Health & Life Recovery Continuum, Pilot 100, decision rules, fiscal discipline, and the immediate request for technical review.
Open Executive Brief1 · Why change?
The evidence and policy case: system conditions, public safety, parole accountability, cost discipline, reentry, workforce, families, victims, behavioral-health access, and institutional reform. It explicitly recognizes existing ADOC programs while identifying access, scale, integration, continuity, facility equity, and accountability as the operating gap.
Read the Foundation2 · Change to what?
The canonical operating model: five stages, fluid progression, universal psychotherapy at Revive entry, individualized continuing intensity, the five-layer Behavioral Health & Life Recovery Continuum, human authority, officer and victim safeguards, fair labor, technology governance, and universal release continuity.
Read the Framework3 · How do we test it?
A limited five-year, 100-resident demonstration with ADOC authority preserved, universal early psychotherapy, tiered counseling intensity, scalable telebehavioral access, institutional non-delivery tracking, independent evaluation, full-cost accounting, and predefined scale/modify/stop rules.
Read Pilot 100Behavioral Health Operating Layer
ALPRP does not claim Alabama has no treatment or rehabilitation programs. The synchronized package starts from existing ADOC capacity and proposes a vendor-independent operating layer that makes access and continuity measurable.
One assessment → one Individual Rehabilitation Plan → one governed resident record → coordinated programs → measurable competencies → human-reviewed stage progression → community handoff.
Explore the Behavioral Health & Life Recovery Continuum →Decision Architecture
Why change?
Change to what?
How test safely?
What happened?
What earns the evidence?
Behavioral health: Every new Revive resident begins psychotherapy. Initial intensity is tiered by clinical need. Pilot 100 tests whether broader continuing access produces enough safety, clinical, behavioral, continuity, and readiness benefit to justify staffing and cost.
Service delivery: Residents cannot be penalized in stage progression because an assigned treatment, assessment, class, or program was unavailable through institutional non-delivery.
Technology: Technology may organize information, expand access, support learning, and flag needs. Consequential correctional, clinical, disciplinary, parole, and release decisions remain with authorized humans.
Implementation fidelity: ADOC remains final on custody, discipline, security, healthcare, and legally reserved authority. Disputes over whether Pilot 100 is being implemented as approved go through joint oversight and may be documented independently as fidelity deviations.
Parole: FY2025's 79% guideline-recommended grant rate was generated predominantly under the prior guideline framework. Revised guidelines became effective September 14, 2025; through July FY2026 the published suggested-grant rate was 13% and concurrence 86%. ALPRP calls for transparent longitudinal validation, not a predetermined parole outcome.
Fiscal figures: ALPRP does not treat conflicting FY2026 ADOC appropriation figures as interchangeable. Statewide totals should be published only with the specific legislative source and funding scope identified.
ALPRP seeks institutional partners to determine whether Pilot 100 can advance from policy design to implementation engineering.
Contact ALPRP