ALPRP · Independent analysis

Transparency Dashboard

Official reports, clear periods and explicit denominators. ALPRP compiles this analysis independently; this is not an ADOC or ABPP website.

Source review: October 6, 2026. Reporting periods differ by series. The FY2026 Q3 landing page is excluded from numerical updates until its tables can be verified.

Verified population, flows, parole and staffing
MeasureValuePeriod and definition
In-house population21,125June 2026; people held in ADOC facilities
Jurisdictional population29,071June 2026; includes people outside ADOC facilities
Design capacity plus renovations12,115ADOC reported capacity measure
Occupancy174.4%21,125 ÷ 12,115; 9,010 above reported capacity
Year-on-year population change+81 in-house / +1,048 jurisdictionalJune 2025 to June 2026; separate populations
Admissions / releases7,655 / 7,120FY2026 through June; +535 is a flow balance, distinct from headcount change
Parole grants / decisions560 / 2,752FY2026 through August; 20.35% grant rate
August parole grants / decisions37 / 306August only; 12.09% grant rate
Guideline concurrence86%FY2026 through August; agreement with grant or denial suggestions
Suggested grant rate13%FY2026 through August; distinct from concurrence and actual grants
Active supervision22,557September 3 snapshot in August ABPP report
Active and inactive records44,802Same snapshot; not all active supervision
Security employees2,386March 31, 2026; all security classifications, not on-duty coverage
Death investigations opened / closed43 / 53January–March 2026; closures include older cases; not same-period deaths
ADOC General Fund appropriation$868,019,393FY2027 enacted, Act 2026-383; appropriation, not actual expenditure

Read the sources

What the data means for ALPRP

The Five Stages coordinate safety, care, learning, responsibility, voluntary victim-centered repair and community continuity. Pilot 100 measures access, workload, costs and outcomes before expansion. Enrollments, completions and community-corrections caseloads remain separate measures; adding them does not establish unique people served inside prisons.

Rehabilitation progression does not override lawful release. Qualified people retain clinical, classification, disciplinary and release decisions. Technology supports accountable human work.

Read the full analysis and dated federal-case update